A few months ago, I took my daughter to the American Girl Store in New York for lunch and shopping. As we settled down to our adorably presented, extraordinarily priced meal, she ate up every part of the experience and every bit of her lunch, until an entire chicken finger dropped on the floor and landed under the table, where thousands of feet had rested before us.
As quickly as I could, I picked up the chicken and put it back on her plate, invoking the five-second rule. My mother and sister-in-law looked on, slightly horrified. Truthfully, I wouldn't have eaten the food myself, but my eating habits are not as challenging as my three-year-old's. My daughter is a dainty eater, except when it comes to sweets. She miraculously always has room for those, so it's a true balancing act to get quality food in her tummy each day.
Asking for a replacement chicken finger would have completely disrupted her momentum, so my desire to see her chow down on a relatively healthy meal outweighed the risk of her getting sick from whatever germs now clung to that chicken. She only ate a few more bites before eyeing the desserts served around us, and she didn't get sick from her meal. In the end, this was a risk worth taking, but how big of a risk was it?
The five-second rule is the idea that food which has fallen on the ground is still safe to eat if it's picked up within five seconds of dropping. Scientific studies have largely debunked this theory. Even my ten-year-old niece, who tested the rule for her science fair, concluded that bacteria instantly attaches to food that has touched the ground, and to no one's surprise, the longer the food lies there, the more yucky stuff it'll have on it. As a result, the safest course of action is to throw out any food that's fallen.Then I think about other studies testing the hygiene hypothesis that say parents have gone overboard sanitizing their kids' lives and that playing in dirt actually helps build their immunity and resistance to allergens and asthma. I think about all the germy things my kids put into their mouths as babies, which didn't cause them to be perpetually sick. Couldn't the argument be made that the occasional five-second rule is actually good for them?It depends on which expert you ask and your personal tolerance for germs. Two of the most well-known studies that tested the five-second rule had very similar results – bacteria begins collecting on food instantly – but their takeaway from the data was different. One study found this to be reason enough to never eat off the floor. Why knowingly ingest more yucky stuff than necessary?The other study concluded that it's unlikely a sufficient amount of bacteria would transfer in five seconds to make a person sick because the food first has to land on a spot that's actually contaminated with dangerous bacteria like E. Coli or Salmonella. This makes the odds of getting sick pretty low and supports the idea that occasionally invoking the five-second rule is no big deal.
While feeding my daughter food off the ground isn't one of my proudest parenting moments, I'm siding with the latter study's conclusion that a dropsy here or there isn't cause for much concern, assuming your child has a healthy immune system.
If you're willing to play Russian roulette with the five-second rule, here are some sub-rules to keep in mind (also known as common sense).
Home safe
It's more reasonable to pick up a piece of food that's fallen on the floor in our own homes than in public spaces. We're already accustomed to the pathogens hanging out on all the surfaces of our house. In a public place, our chance of being exposed to harmful bacteria for which we haven't built immunity increases (strike one against me for letting my daughter eat off the floor of that restaurant).Of course, certain rooms in our houses have more bacteria than others. Eating food from the bathroom floor is an obvious no-no, but kitchens are no safe haven, either. We should approach with caution hot spots where contaminants may have dripped, like raw chicken juice near the garbage can or kitchen sink.
Ground rules
Equally as important as the amount of time food stays on the ground is the surface on which it's resting. Bacteria actually transfers to food more easily from nonporous surfaces like stainless steel, ceramic tile and harder woods than it does from porous flooring like carpeting (My daughter's chicken finger fell onto carpeting, so I like to think this balances out the fact that it fell on a public floor).
The wet bar
Bacteria use moisture to travel, so foods like watermelons, bananas and cooked pasta should go from the floor to the garbage. Dry foods like crackers (and, hopefully, crispy chicken fingers) won't pick up as much bacteria as quickly, and make them a safer bet to eat after falling on the floor.
So I'd love to know, if a cookie falls on your carpet and no one is around to see you, will you eat it? If it's been less than five seconds, you probably can.
During the festive season, parents face the challenge of maintaining healthy sleep habits for their little ones while also navigating travel. Here's how.
When babies start solids, everyone and their mother-in-law warns you: get ready for constipation. Here are foods that magically help, and parents feel good about.
Parenting is hard enough as it is. But add to that the debilitating experience of frequent migraines or pain, and it's nearly impossible. Here's how to cope.
A few months ago, I took my daughter to the American Girl Store in New York for lunch and shopping. As we settled down to our adorably presented, extraordinarily priced meal, she ate up every part of the experience and every bit of her lunch, until an entire chicken finger dropped on the floor and landed under the table, where thousands of feet had rested before us.
As quickly as I could, I picked up the chicken and put it back on her plate, invoking the five-second rule. My mother and sister-in-law looked on, slightly horrified. Truthfully, I wouldn't have eaten the food myself, but my eating habits are not as challenging as my three-year-old's. My daughter is a dainty eater, except when it comes to sweets. She miraculously always has room for those, so it's a true balancing act to get quality food in her tummy each day.
Asking for a replacement chicken finger would have completely disrupted her momentum, so my desire to see her chow down on a relatively healthy meal outweighed the risk of her getting sick from whatever germs now clung to that chicken. She only ate a few more bites before eyeing the desserts served around us, and she didn't get sick from her meal. In the end, this was a risk worth taking, but how big of a risk was it?
The five-second rule is the idea that food which has fallen on the ground is still safe to eat if it's picked up within five seconds of dropping. Scientific studies have largely debunked this theory. Even my ten-year-old niece, who tested the rule for her science fair, concluded that bacteria instantly attaches to food that has touched the ground, and to no one's surprise, the longer the food lies there, the more yucky stuff it'll have on it. As a result, the safest course of action is to throw out any food that's fallen.
Then I think about other studies testing the hygiene hypothesis that say parents have gone overboard sanitizing their kids' lives and that playing in dirt actually helps build their immunity and resistance to allergens and asthma. I think about all the germy things my kids put into their mouths as babies, which didn't cause them to be perpetually sick. Couldn't the argument be made that the occasional five-second rule is actually good for them?
It depends on which expert you ask and your personal tolerance for germs. Two of the most well-known studies that tested the five-second rule had very similar results – bacteria begins collecting on food instantly – but their takeaway from the data was different. One study found this to be reason enough to never eat off the floor. Why knowingly ingest more yucky stuff than necessary?
The other study concluded that it's unlikely a sufficient amount of bacteria would transfer in five seconds to make a person sick because the food first has to land on a spot that's actually contaminated with dangerous bacteria like E. Coli or Salmonella. This makes the odds of getting sick pretty low and supports the idea that occasionally invoking the five-second rule is no big deal.
While feeding my daughter food off the ground isn't one of my proudest parenting moments, I'm siding with the latter study's conclusion that a dropsy here or there isn't cause for much concern, assuming your child has a healthy immune system.
If you're willing to play Russian roulette with the five-second rule, here are some sub-rules to keep in mind (also known as common sense).
Rebecca Lang
Author